tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33693245.post999719007537540511..comments2024-03-04T23:40:58.133+05:30Comments on The Big Picture: Land Bill setback could be a blessing in disguiseThe Big Picturehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06018983225756352176noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33693245.post-8658030807747410532015-09-04T01:46:22.008+05:302015-09-04T01:46:22.008+05:30Here when you say call option you mean Singaporean...Here when you say call option you mean Singaporean way of treating land as call option and is the way used by c.b.naidu is any different from that.suryanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33693245.post-85544213409755165232015-08-17T14:13:50.503+05:302015-08-17T14:13:50.503+05:30For most of the project who are appreciative in na...For most of the project who are appreciative in nature, Govt Should acquire 4 times the land required, First part used for project, Second part for (partially) funding the project and other two parts should be distributed back to the people from whom land was required, along with monetary compensation. So if development is appreciative in nature each of the stack holder benefits. <br /><br />I have shared same comments on some of the post on Rediff years back.Bhupeshhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16798542111255726399noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33693245.post-3002570099443764822015-08-17T13:20:15.296+05:302015-08-17T13:20:15.296+05:30Thanks Prof.
It is indeed heartening to see that...Thanks Prof. <br /><br />It is indeed heartening to see that AP CM Naidu has come up with an innovative approach.<br />Land aquisition is a bit surprising at the moment because it was seen Govt has already lockedup land.... acquired from SEZ policy and with its own PSUs. <br />That should have been used first..<br /><br />as for public infra ... there should have been some way of having ownership of dispossessed on the projects as you have suggested.<br /><br />DeepsAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33693245.post-51947467954114050552015-08-17T08:17:19.718+05:302015-08-17T08:17:19.718+05:30Unknown, Yes, of course. The point is that one-sho...Unknown, Yes, of course. The point is that one-shot compensation is not adequate because of faulty price discovery.<br /><br />TTRT T Ram Mohanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06925858642839337950noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33693245.post-64958936080999781282015-08-16T11:12:15.273+05:302015-08-16T11:12:15.273+05:30‘Parliament can consider a fresh set of options’ –...‘Parliament can consider a fresh set of options’ – it is surprising that the draft land bill has not considered/evaluated/discussed approach taken by Naidu. <br />There is no guarantee of appreciation– and that the option will be indeed valuable (experience with some SEZ show this) <br />If a ‘land giver’ gets an attractive compensation (that covers opportunity cost for few years plus more – this includes employee guarantee schemes, subsidised canteen, skill development opportunities, cheaper loans etc.) along with an option to ride the upside, his willingness to offer land could increase. <br />Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08628699681743981423noreply@blogger.com