I return to a theme I have flagged several times in the past. Banking in the west is in the doldrums. How do we revive it? One of the most thorough expositions comes from former RBI governor YV Reddy. For those who came in late, Reddy is widely recognised for his contribution in inulating the Indian banking sector from the financial crisis. He was profiled in the New York Times, perhaps a first for a central banker from India. His views are heard with respect in international banking circles.
Reddy outlines his views on the present problems in banking in his Per Jacobsson lecture delivered in Basel. We need a multi-pronged approach, he says, that covers regulation, the size of the financial sector in the economy, global governance and the ownership structure in banking.
I covered the lecture in my ET column, How do we restore trust in banks?
Friday, July 20, 2012
Thursday, July 05, 2012
Western banking model is flawed
It took two phone calls to the outgoing Chairman of Barclays to oust Bob Diamond, the CEO of the embattled British bank. One was from the governor of the Bank of England. The other was from the Chairman of the Financial Services Authority. The calls followed what has come to be called the rate-rigging scandal in which Barclays (and, supposedly, other banks) tried to manipulate the Libor to suit their ends.
This is not the only brush Barclays has had with regulators in recent years: it has faced charges of tax evasion and mis-selling of products. It invited strong criticism when its CEO was awarded a large pay packet last year despite the bank's poor performance.
For bankers, this is the second big blow in recent months. Earlier, we had JP Morgan Chase's huge trading loss, now estimated to be in the range of $5-9 bn. The blow is especially hard because Diamond and Dimon- the phonetic similarity in the names of the two CEOs is striking- were in the forefront of bankers' counterattack on regulators who had been leaning hard on bankers ever since the sub-prime crisis. Diamond famously said after he took over as CEO about 18 months ago that it was time for bankers to stop apologising and to get on with making money.
Banking reform has focused so far on higher capital requirements and some separation between investment banking and commercial banking activities. There are also 'living wills' for large banks, an early version of which has just been put out. Alas, it is becoming clear that these will not tackle the problems that beset banking today. Concentration has increased and large banks are proving unmanageable; employee pay as a proportion of income refuses to come down even when returns on equity do not meet the cost of capital; banks are in a deleveraging mode which makes it even more difficult to produce returns; they are exposed to the Eurozone debt crisis; and their orientation towards retail customers especially is appalling.
What is required is a broom that will sweep clean and sweep aside a culture that has come into vogue since the Big Bang in London and in which investment banks dominate the commercial banking side. I am inclined to believe that the ownership structure in western banks has to change. I do not advocate 100% public ownership- that creates inefficiency. But nor do I favour 100% private ownership- that creates instability because bankers face the wrong incentives in a situation of high leverage. What is required a mix of ownership in the banking sector where listed public sector banks compete with private banks. Then you have competition and efficiency, and you also have stability because public ownership, with its innate conservatism, acts as the sheet anchor of the system.
In other words, the time is ripe to export the Indian banking model to the west (or at least to Europe since the US will find it difficult to stomach public ownership of banks). More in my ET column,
West needs Indian bank model.
This is not the only brush Barclays has had with regulators in recent years: it has faced charges of tax evasion and mis-selling of products. It invited strong criticism when its CEO was awarded a large pay packet last year despite the bank's poor performance.
For bankers, this is the second big blow in recent months. Earlier, we had JP Morgan Chase's huge trading loss, now estimated to be in the range of $5-9 bn. The blow is especially hard because Diamond and Dimon- the phonetic similarity in the names of the two CEOs is striking- were in the forefront of bankers' counterattack on regulators who had been leaning hard on bankers ever since the sub-prime crisis. Diamond famously said after he took over as CEO about 18 months ago that it was time for bankers to stop apologising and to get on with making money.
Banking reform has focused so far on higher capital requirements and some separation between investment banking and commercial banking activities. There are also 'living wills' for large banks, an early version of which has just been put out. Alas, it is becoming clear that these will not tackle the problems that beset banking today. Concentration has increased and large banks are proving unmanageable; employee pay as a proportion of income refuses to come down even when returns on equity do not meet the cost of capital; banks are in a deleveraging mode which makes it even more difficult to produce returns; they are exposed to the Eurozone debt crisis; and their orientation towards retail customers especially is appalling.
What is required is a broom that will sweep clean and sweep aside a culture that has come into vogue since the Big Bang in London and in which investment banks dominate the commercial banking side. I am inclined to believe that the ownership structure in western banks has to change. I do not advocate 100% public ownership- that creates inefficiency. But nor do I favour 100% private ownership- that creates instability because bankers face the wrong incentives in a situation of high leverage. What is required a mix of ownership in the banking sector where listed public sector banks compete with private banks. Then you have competition and efficiency, and you also have stability because public ownership, with its innate conservatism, acts as the sheet anchor of the system.
In other words, the time is ripe to export the Indian banking model to the west (or at least to Europe since the US will find it difficult to stomach public ownership of banks). More in my ET column,
West needs Indian bank model.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)