The plunge in the exchange rate of the rupee has come as a rude shock to policy makers and businessmen. The plunge comes at a time when India's economic fundamentals are better than before.
Despite seemingly sound fundamentals, FIIs are exiting India. Why? For most of 2025, it was because India came to attract Trump tariffs of over 50 per cent including punitive tariffs of 25 per cent for buying oil from Russia. FIIs saw the US administration posture towards India as a negative. That problem was resolved in February 2026. Then in March came the Iran war which pushed oil prices to well over $100 a barrel.
Oil prices of over $100 can push India's current account deficit (CAD) to over 2 per cent. That's a level that policy makers are okay but not foreign investors. India's CAD averaged 0.8 per cent in the last five years. They stayed low, thanks to oil prices staying well below $100 for the most part.
I argue in my BS article that oil prices rising above $100 expose a vulnerability in the Indian economy.
Iran shock
highlights India’s external vulnerability
Managing external risks may require
reining in growth ambitions
Going by the revised gross domestic product (GDP) series, the Indian economy grew by 7.2 per cent, 7.1 per cent, and 7.6 per cent in FY 24, FY 25, and FY 26, respectively. This is a truly impressive growth record in an environment marked by the Ukraine conflict, high interest rates in Western economies, and Trump tariffs. have posed serious challenges.
Even a tariff
rate of over 50 per cent on much of India’s exports to the United States could
not stop the Indian economy in its stride. With the inflation rate at an
extremely benign 3 per cent, it appeared that India was finally set on a 7 per
cent growth trajectory even in a difficult global environment. The conflict in
Iran, now paused for two weeks, threatens to undermine these expectations.
The truly
unsettling element in the scenario has been the fall in the exchange rate of
the rupee. The fall predates the Iran conflict. The conflict has merely
accentuated an underlying trend. The nominal effective exchange rate of the
rupee has fallen by 8.5 per and the real
effective exchange rate by 8.1per cent in the period from February 2025 to February
2026 (trade-weighted 40 currency basket). The latter is well beyond the Reserve
Bank of India’s comfort zone of 5 per cent.
A
growth rate of over 7 per cent, an inflation rate below 3 per cent and a
current account deficit of 0.8 per cent scarcely justify a fall of this order.
The fall has to do entirely with capital flows. There was a net foreign
portfolio investment (FPI) outflow of ~1.52 trillion in FY26. These are the
highest FII outflows ever in any given year. They exceed the outflows of ~1.22
trillion in the Covid-impacted year of 2021-22.
In
2021-22, the growth outlook was nowhere as positive as it is today. The
inflation rate was running at 5.5 per cent. The banking system was under
considerable stress. The flight of FII funds was entirely understandable. Why
would FIIs want to exit an economy growing at over 7 per cent, with inflation
at 3 per cent and banking system indicators that are highly favourable?
The
outflows are perceived to have happened on account of the punitive tariffs
imposed on India by the Trump administration. FIIs were said to perceive the US
administration’s stance towards India as a big negative for the economy. It was
a risk factor that argued against staying exposed to India.
The tariff
issue was resolved with the Indo-US interim trade agreement in February 2026. In
the same month came the judgment of the US Supreme Court striking down the
Trump administration’s tariff regime. For the present, India, like everybody
else, is subject to tariffs of 10 per cent on its exports to the US. It
cannot be that the tariff factor is material to the exchange rate of the rupee
any more.
The
material factor is the war in Iran. It has changed the outlook far more
drastically than the Trump tariffs had done. The impact on growth and inflation
are still manageable. Several agencies now project India’s growth at 6.5-7 per
cent or even 6 per cent, down from 7 per cent earlier. Inflation is projected at 4.5 to 5 per cent,
which is within the RBI’s inflation band. Neither projection is scary.
It is the
current account position that is seriously impacted by higher oil prices.
Analysts see the current account deficit (CAD) going up to 1.8 per cent of GDP if
oil prices remain at $85 per barrel throughout the year. That is what the RBI
has assumed for FY 27 in its April Monetary Policy Report. If oil prices are
above $100, the CAD could be higher than 2 per cent.
That does
change the perspective drastically for foreign investors. India’s policy makers
have always believed that a CAD of up to 2.5 per cent is manageable. What
investors will focus on, however, is a significant worsening in relation to the
past five years. When FIIs see CAD increasing steeply from an average of 0.8
per cent of GDP in the past five years to around 2 per cent, expectations of a
depreciation in the rupee are inevitable. As FIIs head for the exit to protect
their returns, these expectations will prove self-fulfilling.
It is
clear that improvements in the fundamentals of the Indian economy in recent
years have concealed an important vulnerability: The impact of oil prices
above $100 a barrel on the current account deficit. This vulnerability was not
noticed because world prices have stayed below $ 100 for most of the past five
years, except for about four months in 2022 after the Ukraine conflict erupted.
They have stayed below $80 over the past two years.
The
conviction in the markets has been that oil prices will stay in the mid-60s
under President Donald Trump. The rise in oil prices to well over $100 a
barrel over the past month has upset all
calculations. No surprise that, until the announcement of the ceasefire
in Iran, the downward pressure on the rupee seemed relentless.
There is
not much the government can do about the prices of oil and related products. It
can at best focus on ensuring supply and cushioning the price impact on
consumers. So far, it has done a good job on both counts.
As for the
exchange rate, intervention by the RBI can only manage the fall in the rupee,
it cannot prevent it. If the ceasefire does not last and oil prices stay
elevated for a long period, the RBI may have little choice but to increase the policy
rate. The cumulative reduction in the RBI’s policy rate of 125 basis points
since February 2025 is now beginning to look somewhat imprudent. With the
economy growing at around 7 per cent, it
may have been wiser to have exercised
restraint , given the enormous uncertainties in the international environment
ever since President Trump assumed office in January 2025.
There
is an important lesson here for policymakers. If we are to effectively manage
risks in the economy, if stability is not to be compromised, it is necessary to
rein in aspirations for GDP growth. In a troubled global environment, a growth
rate of close to 7 per cent is not something to be sniffed at. Macroeconomic policies
that seek to accelerate the growth rate at the current level of savings and
investment expose the economy to avoidable risk.