China is not as dependent one exports for its growth as is made out to be, according to the Economist. Investment accounts for 40% of China's growth. This won't be heavily affected by a drop in exports because over half of it is domestically driven- it has to do with infrastructure and property. It cites a research report that forecasts that a downturn in the US economy will result in China's growth slowing down from 11.5% to 10%- hardly catastrophic. The US may be more export-dependent than China- exports contribute 30% to US growth.
The high share of exports to GDP- 40%- in China may be deceptive. Exports are measured as gross revenues whereas GDP is the value added. A UBS analyst has attempted to measure China's exports in value added terms and measure these as a proportion of GDP. The ratio is much lower- 10%. This, the analyst suggests, is a measure of "true" export dependency of the Chinese economy.
I guess this reinforces my position that growth in China and India will help mitigate the effects of a US downturn on the world economy.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
Sir,
Here you have introduced the concept of GDP in net value added terms and Exports as gross value. But if I am not wrong when we calculate GDP by expenditure method Net Exports (NX) is a part of total income.(Y = C+I+G+NX). Then why this gross-net distinction?
Cool story you got here. I'd like to read something more concerning that theme. Thnx for posting this data.
Sexy Lady
London escort
It is certainly interesting for me to read that post. Thanks for it. I like such themes and anything connected to this matter. I definitely want to read a bit more on that blog soon.
Pretty interesting site you've got here. Thanx for it. I like such themes and anything connected to them. BTW, try to add some photos :).
Post a Comment