Central banks in advanced economics cannot make up their minds whether they should priortise growth over inflation in the months to come. That is because it's hard to predict how the Ukraine conflict will shape.
At the moment, they have prioritised inflation. But if the conflict worsens, growth will be the bigger problem. My column in BS today, Central banks haven't got it wrong.
FINGER ON THE PULSE
Central banks haven’t got it wrong
TT RAM MOHAN
Central banks in advanced economies are today in thrall to the conflict in Ukraine. Emerging market central banks, in turn, are in thrall to the actions taken by the US Federal Reserve. Those who fault central banks for their response to inflation in recent months seem to gloss over these facts.
During the global financial crisis of 2007, central banks knew what they had to do- loosen monetary policy and keep doing so. Likewise, during the pandemic. Now, the course is nowhere as clear.
The conflict in Ukraine has rendered the conduct of monetary policy extremely difficult. There is still no knowing how the conflict will pan out. Western sanctions against Russia are unprecedented in their scope and severity. And it’s hard to say how Russia will respond as the conflict rages on.
The US Federal Reserve faces an unenviable task. With the inflation rate in the US at 9.1 per cent in June, analysts warned that a recession was imminent. Some claim that the US is already in recession. This would imply that the Fed should go slow on rate hikes to fight inflation.
Hold on. After the last meeting of the Federal Open Markets Committee, Fed Jerome Powell poured cold water on talk of a recession. US unemployment rate in July was 3.5 per cent, which was the level before the pandemic set in. This meant that the Fed should tighten more aggressively, not less so, as the recession school contended.
If that is not confusing enough, the conflict in Ukraine is a huge imponderable. Do we know whether or not the impact of Ukraine on the world economy is played out? If central banks reckon that the oil price will stay in the range of $100-110, they would be justified in concluding that inflation is the bigger threat at the moment. However, if Russia moves to cut supplies drastically, all bets on oil prices are off and growth is seriously threatened.
JP Morgan Chase has warned that, in an extreme scenario, Russia could slash dramatically oil supplies in response to the oil price cap imposed by the West. Oil prices could then surge to $380 dollar a barrel. At that price, global growth will collapse and inflation will cease to be the priority for central banks.
So great is the uncertainty created by Ukraine that, after the last meet, Mr Powell refrained from providing forward guidance, that is, any indication of exactly what rate hikes to expect in the coming months. Nor is the Fed in a hurry to return to the inflation target of 2 per cent for the US. It seems quite happy to return to the target by end 2023.
If the task for the Fed is so complicated, the challenge for central banks in emerging markets, including the RBI, can well be imagined. In addition to factoring in the outlook for growth and inflation, they have to keep a wary eye on the exchange rate. Coping with the “spillovers” of Fed policy is testing the mettle of emerging market central banks.
That should explain the stance taken by the Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) of RBI earlier this month. The MPC made no change to its forecasts for growth and inflation in 2022-23. Nevertheless, it thought fit to increase the policy rate by 50 basis points. The MPC argued that the increase was needed to anchor inflation expectations and to bring the inflation rate closer to the target of 4 per cent.
That does not sound very convincing. With the actions taken so far, the RBI can at best hope to bring the inflation rate down to the target only by end 2023, exactly as the Fed intends to. The RBI, like the Fed, has chosen not to provide forward guidance.
The more plausible explanation is that the RBI is keen to manage the exchange rate of the rupee after the Fed’s rate hike of 75 basis points. The real effective exchange rate of the rupee against a basket of currencies has been steady over the past year. Analysts have argued that we could do with a depreciation in the real effective exchange rate in order to boost exports.
However, when it comes to managing capital flows, it is the exchange rate with respect to the dollar that matters. The dollar is the safe haven for funds. In order to stem the outflow of capital, it is important that the rupee not depreciate too much with respect to the dollar. If portfolio investors sense a steep depreciation with respect to the dollar, they will flee the rupee. The RBI’s policy rate moves are thus substantially dictated by the Fed’s own. One wonders whether the RBI would have thought it necessary to raise the repo rate if the Fed itself had settled for a more modest increase.
On a broader note, critics of central banks say that central banks failed to catch the impetus to inflation post the pandemic. Many believe central banks have laid the ground for stagflation similar to the one witnessed post the oil shocks of 1973 and 1979. As the annual economic report of the Bank for International Settlements (June 2022) makes clear, the critics are off the mark. The behaviour of commodity prices this time has been different from that in the 1970s. So are the economic backdrop and monetary policy regimes.
First, the oil price shock has been less severe this time around. Oil price have increased by 50 per cent since mid-2021 and are around their long-term averages. In 1973, oil prices doubled in a month and touched historic highs. Secondly, higher energy prices impact growth to a less extent today because of the reduced energy-intensity of GDP. Thirdly, the 1973 rise in prices happened on the back of several years of rising inflation. In contrast, today’s episode follows years of low inflation. Lastly, the institutional frameworks for monetary policy and for anchoring inflation expectations are far more robust today.
Forecasts of economic doom in the year ahead are premature and central bank-bashing is misplaced. Central banks are not behind the curve on inflation nor is a soft landing inconceivable in the US. To be sure, things could change dramatically if the conflict in Ukraine worsens. But that is hardly something central banks can prepare for.
(ttrammohan28@gmail.com)
No comments:
Post a Comment